Angelo Alamo Bernardo
| Year | Office sought | Party | Votes | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | MayorPalanan | PFP | 7,354100.0% | ✓ Won |
| 2022 | MayorPalanan | NP | 4,78950.4% | ✓ Won |
| 2013 | MayorPalanan | NPC | — | ✓ Won |
| 2010 | MayorPalanan | LKS-KAM | — | ✓ Won |
| 2007 | MayorPalanan | NPC | — | ✓ Won |
| 2004 | Vice MayorPalanan | NPC | — | ✓ Won |
| 2001 | CouncilorPalanan | NPC | — | ✓ Won |
Source: COMELEC certified results compiled by Open Halalan (ODbL 1.0), via BetterGov Dynasties. Vote counts are as reported in the compilation.
Every party affiliation must cite a source. Affiliations are never inferred from election speculation.
Patterns where a seat stayed with this official or the same surname after a term limit. These moves are legal; the level measures how concentrated the seat became, not wrongdoing.
Same-surname successor took the seat: Bernie Bernardo · Won the same office back in 2022 · Surname held this office 27 straight years
This is not a “clean record” certification. It means no case has been entered and verified in this database yet. Check the Office of the Ombudsman, Sandiganbayan, and Supreme Court directly.
6 of 390 local seats are held by officials surnamed Bernardo (2025 elections).
Elected in the 2023 barangay & SK elections (DILG directory). Matched by last name only within Isabela; a common surname is very likely to include unrelated families. The list above shows only the punong barangay and SK chairs.
A surname bloc is officials elected in one province who carry the same surname as last or middle name; barangay & SK officials with the same last name are listed separately. Shared names may not mean kinship, and a bloc is not evidence of wrongdoing. Definition and data:BetterGov.ph Dynasties
Commission on Audit results for Palanan in years Angelo Bernardo was mayor for the whole calendar year. COA audits the local government unit, not the official.
COA says an audit opinion is not a rating, score or grade and should not be ranked. It covers whether the financial statements are fairly presented — it is not a finding of wrongdoing. Sources & method →
A transparent composite of measurable public-service indicators. It does not measure personal integrity, and unproven allegations are never used as a penalty. Weights are demonstration settings you can change.